10 Apr
2009
10 Apr
'09
10:56 p.m.
Luís Oliveira wrote:
I see. For our purposes, though, it seems that if CODE-CHAR returns NIL, we should signal a test failure immediately.
I don't understand why. If code-char is allowed to return nil, explicitly, in the CL standard, why consider that to be a babel test failure? Shouldn't it be possible to run the regression test under CCL and have it succeed if babel does not have bugs? -- Dan