Thanks for the prompt reply.
20.04.2019, 16:17, Antoniotti Marco antoniotti.marco@disco.unimib.itHi
the CDR situation is as you see it.
Indeed; I hope for a partial revival (and in any case unambiguous identifiers are useful)
1. I agree that the links for the mailing lists could go to the Mailman pages.
Does it make sense for me to submit a patch, and if yes — against what?
Is the static HTML the true source?
2. It has been a while, but why not?
OK, thanks.
I am not sure what you mean with your last question.
Well, CDR4 defines that the initial mutable-proposal period is 6 weeks, but a longer period could be negotiated; from my experience with discussions in other communities, I would want to freeze the document based on the discussion beginning and then running out of changes to discuss (or out of arguments for/against some change), not by some time limit precisely agreed upon in advance.
- I think the links should go to
https://mailman.common-lisp.net/listinfo/cdr-announce https://mailman.common-lisp.net/listinfo/cdr-devel https://mailman.common-lisp.net/listinfo/cdr-discuss
I guess I also have a process-related question: do I understand correctly that negotiating a longer (maximum) initial period is compatible with declaring a condition for ending it before the negotiated maximum (but after 6 weeks after initial proposal)?