The conversation below may be relevant to the members of this mailing list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 8:57 PM Subject: Re: Testing GitLab installation & migration nearing completion: steps to cut-over To: Robert Swindells <rjs@fdy2.co.uk> Hi Robert, On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 1:33 PM, <rjs@fdy2.co.uk> wrote:

"Erik Huelsmann" <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:

...

Hi all,

As some of you have noticed this weekend, we're still working on migrating the common-lisp.net repositories to GitLab. While doing so, a few e-mails have been sent out while they should have been held and deleted on the testing system. My appologies if it caused confusion or inconvenience.

Would it be possible to keep using Subversion for the mit-cadr repository ?

Yes! *Nothing* is going to happen to Subversion repositories. This migration concerns Git repositories for now, but the bigger trend will impact the following VC systems: CVS, darcs, Git, mercurial (but not Subversion) as laid out in this mail: https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/clo-devel/2015-February/000168.htm... -- Bye, Erik. http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in. -- Bye, Erik. http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.