pro August 2018

pro@common-lisp.net

11 participants
2 discussions

Common Lisp style: multiple packages in same repo
by Daniel Pezely 27 Aug '18

27 Aug '18

I posted this to Stack Overflow but was hoping for more input. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51638864/common-lisp-style-multiple-pac… May I get recommendations or links to representative code repositories with good style for multiple related Common Lisp packages, please? For instance, consider a high-level workflow library with accompanying lower-level API, each in its own CL package but same git repo due to synchronized releases. Each system (|*.asd| file) isolates tests and may be invoked using: |(asdf:test-system foo :force t)| Separate systems may be built via |make|, which definitely helps isolate SBCL code-coverage reports. Some users of the library may only want to load the lower-level API. For simplifying dependencies for those using higher-level API, it seems best to keep everything bundled in one repo. Any revision to one library would likely require updating all for the same release. I currently have a single directory tree with a subdirectory for each CL package. There's a top-level |Makefile| plus one in each subdirectory that the library maintain would use. The top-level also contains symbolic links for |.asd| files pointing into relevant subdirectories. (It's a library deeply dependent upon POSIX calls via |uiop-posix|, so it's only applicable on an OS with sym-links.) This seems to be an issue at large considering issue #1 for Quicklisp-docs [0]. Found nothing relevant in Google's CL style guide [1], State of the Common Lisp Ecosystem, 2015 [2], Edi's CL Recipes [3] or Lisp-lang [4]. Browsing repos seem to have quite a mix of styles. * [0] https://github.com/rudolfochrist/quicklisp-docs/issues/1 * [1] https://google.github.io/styleguide/lispguide.xml * [2] https://web.archive.org/web/20160305061250/http://eudoxia.me/article/common… * [3] http://weitz.de/cl-recipes/ * [4] http://lisp-lang.org/learn/writing-libraries but see also their section on Continuous Integration Repo to be fixed: https://gitlab.com/dpezely/cl-mmap (commit a23bd88d of 2018-07-14; release will be tagged when fixed) Thanks, -Daniel

8 16

Paredit-mode in the slime repl
by Alexandre Rademaker 06 Aug '18

06 Aug '18

After the last Emacs upgrade to 26.1, the M-s key bind from paredit-mode is replaced by `Next element matching (regexp)` command in the slime repl buffer. Sorry for the silly question, but how to get M-s mapped to paredit-splice-sexp again? In a lisp file buffer it is working as expected. Best, -- Alexandre Rademaker http://arademaker.github.io

4 5

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

pro August 2018