Perhaps I'm missing something, but why would using *meta-dispatcher* be preferred to, say, just setting the server-dispatch-table? I've been using virtual hosts without *meta-dispatcher* and I'd like to minimize the global changes that would change the behavior of, say, other servers that one might bring up in the same instance.
Thanks,
Cyrus
On Jul 29, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Ram Krishnan wrote:
Perfect. Thanks for the follow up.
Also, thanks Edi for Hunchentoot and all the other excellent Lisp packages you've contributed.
Regards,
-ram
On 7/29/07, Edi Weitz edi@agharta.de wrote: On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 21:16:57 -0700, "Ram Krishnan" < rkris@kriyative.net> wrote:
Are there any problems in subverting the *META-DISPATCHER* binding this way? Is there a better alternative?
Looks OK to me. That (virtual host support) was actually one of the reasons why *META-DISPATCHER* is there.
Cheers, Edi. _______________________________________________ tbnl-devel site list tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel
tbnl-devel site list tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel