Thanks for your replies, I'll go with what I've written then, so that who wants may evaluate the patches, (they'll be provided into a separate lisp file, the will override some hunchentoot functions). The modifications will be available in one day or two into claw project registered at common-lisp.net
For what concerning the example on port, it was just an example, to make present that in some environment, asking configuration modifications to the edp group of a cutomer, may result a pain (I speak for experience).
Thx for suggestions, Have a nice day,
kiuma On Jan 17, 2008 10:09 AM, Nicolas Neuss neuss@math.uni-karlsruhe.de wrote:
"Andrea Chiumenti" kiuma72@gmail.com writes:
Anyway since my project seems the only with the need of different sessions, I'll try another approach that doesn't involve hunchentoot for my needs, before publishing the first commit. Have a nice day, kiuma
I also have three SBCL/hunchentoot servers running on the same machine which could be replaced by one with the help of your patches. So, in principle I would be interested in this feature if it could be integrated in Hunchentoot nicely. However, even if such a version of Hunchentoot would be available I am not sure if running only one instance would be a good idea, since a bug in one application would wreak havoc on all.
[I must admit that I had no problems in asking our computing center for more open ports. If this would not have worked, I probably would have put my servers behind Apache/modlisp (which I probably will do anyway at some point, because people occasionally reported problems accessing my servers from places which allowed only connections on port 8080).]
Nicolas
tbnl-devel site list tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel