Just noting that I do use ssl and *dispatch-table*, so I would prefer having an easy-ssl-acceptor added to the next release.
Thanks for all the hard work.
Bryan
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Hans Hübner hans.huebner@gmail.com wrote:
I put some work into updating the documentation to reflect how request processing is done. The documentation is now a bit more clear about the base functionality and the functionality that is provided by HUNCHENTOOT:EASY-ACCEPTOR. In a nutshell, if you have been using DEFINE-EASY-HANDLER and/or *DISPATCH-TABLE* in the past, you'll want to use EASY-ACCEPTOR instead of ACCEPTOR from now on.
Currently, no EASY-SSL-ACCEPTOR class is defined. If you need it, you can simply add it ( (defclass easy-ssl-acceptor (easy-acceptor ssl-acceptor) ()) - If you do, please let me know so I'll add it to the next release.
I will wait a few more days to collect your input and make corrections before I release v1.2.1 to include the documentation update and any hot fixes that might be required.
Thanks! -Hans
tbnl-devel site list tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel