As mentioned by Stig Sando (Fufie) on #lisp:
"What I miss on the site is the following:
- Names of the project members and sponsors, ie who is running things
- What open source/free projects can get hosting? DFSG? Wider than
DFSG? Stricter than DFSG? 'Hosting decisions are made on
case-by-case basis.' is fine, but some examples of accepted licences
would be nice.
- Can projects hosted elsewhere use one or more of the services on
common-lisp.net
- How about VHOSTs for the webspace?
- How about cron-jobs, e.g for rsync of cclan?"
And:
"14:22 <Fufie> there's also no written guarantee on not reselling email-lists,
source, etc
14:23 <Fufie> ie a bit short on the legalese, disclaimers, .."
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus
Hi all,
I've been talking to Erik Enge on #lisp and suggesting to go into full
support mode for arch. (-:
What is left to do: not much, really. development of arch-based projects
on common-lisp.net is possible already, as both non-anonymous ftp and
anonftp are supported.
What would be good to have: a few things.
* sftp support for people who are reluctant to transmit passwords in
plain text over the net. this will probably also benefit users who
don't use arch.
* no delay between uploading something and it appearing in the anonftp
download area. Would it be possible to upload to the download area
directly? Erik said it was a permission problem. That should be
easily fixed, I guess (-:
Erik also asked about a script to send notifications to project mailing
lists when a change get committed to the arch archive. This is a little
harder to implement, but should be doable via the "dnotify" agent. I'll
look into that when I have the time.
Anyway, thanks for putting up common-lisp.net!
Good night,
--
Andreas Fuchs, <asf(a)acm.org>, asf(a)jabber.at, antifuchs
Hi,
I've updated the "resources & learning" page. It is here:
http://www.igpm.rwth-aachen.de/mommer/white_sands/learn.html
What do you guys think?
Should I call this page "learning Common Lisp" instead and reshuffle
everything?
I'm planning to integrate this with the rest of the site soon, if
nobody objects...
Regards,
Mario.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 03:40:33PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
> are the mailing lists available on gmane.org?
Clo-devel should now be available on gmane, archives coming up.
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus
[ Apologies to those who get this twice. ]
As seen on cll:
"It is a pleasure to announce
http://common-lisp.net,
a web-site dedicated to providing the Common Lisp community with
development resources, including CVS, FTP, mailing lists, and
web-space.
Future plans include Subversion and Arch support, co-operation with
other related projects, plus news and articles (authors are welcome!)."
CCLAN is definitely a project we (Common-lisp.net) would like to
co-operate with.
Possibilities include:
* CCLAN node at ftp://ftp.common-lisp.net/pub/cclan/
* Semi-automatic inclusion of projects hosted at Common-lisp.net to
CCLAN: hosted projects fullfilling CCLAN requirements would be
provided a mechanism for making releases into CCLAN without
human intervention (or whatever amount of human intervention
is considered necessary for safety).
The first is probably a relatively simple matter, but the second would
require among other things a common aproach to project names.
Before boring everyone with my own thoughts on this I'd like to hear
if CCLAN folks consider either option in the least viable.
[ Note: Let's keep this discussion on cclan-list, and drop clo-devel
from CC. People on clo-devel interested in this should subscribe to
cclan-list for the duration. ]
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus
As seen on cll:
"It is a pleasure to announce
http://common-lisp.net,
a web-site dedicated to providing the Common Lisp community with
development resources, including CVS, FTP, mailing lists, and
web-space.
Future plans include Subversion and Arch support, co-operation with
other related projects, plus news and articles (authors are welcome!)."
CCLAN is definitely a project we (Common-lisp.net) would like to
co-operate with.
Possibilities include:
* CCLAN node at ftp://ftp.common-lisp.net/pub/cclan/
* Semi-automatic inclusion of projects hosted at Common-lisp.net to
CCLAN: hosted projects fullfilling CCLAN requirements would be
provided a mechanism for making releases into CCLAN without
human intervention (or whatever amount of human intervention
is considered necessary for safety).
The first is probably a relatively simple matter, but the second would
require among other things a common aproach to project names.
Before boring everyone with my own thoughts on this I'd like to hear
if CCLAN folks consider either option in the least viable.
[ Note: Let's keep this discussion on cclan-list, and drop clo-devel
from CC. People on clo-devel interested in this should subscribe to
cclan-list for the duration. ]
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus
I think we need two more tables (boxes is probably a better word) in the
very near future: one for news items ("just set up anoncvs; server
upgrade at 12:00", etc.) and one for articles ("how to use albert with
your .asd file; unit test framework study", etc.).
What do you think about it? Would they fit with our current layout? I
think these need to be on the front page, but not necessarily on any
other page.
Erik.
maybe i just missed it, but is anonymous cvs read access enabled?
--
-Marco
Ring the bells that still can ring.
Forget your perfect offering.
There is a crack in everything.
That's how the light gets in.
-Leonard Cohen