- clo-devel - mailman3.common-lisp.net

[Clo-devel] On supporting arch
by Andreas Fuchs 22 Aug '03

22 Aug '03

Hi all, I've been talking to Erik Enge on #lisp and suggesting to go into full support mode for arch. (-: What is left to do: not much, really. development of arch-based projects on common-lisp.net is possible already, as both non-anonymous ftp and anonftp are supported. What would be good to have: a few things. * sftp support for people who are reluctant to transmit passwords in plain text over the net. this will probably also benefit users who don't use arch. * no delay between uploading something and it appearing in the anonftp download area. Would it be possible to upload to the download area directly? Erik said it was a permission problem. That should be easily fixed, I guess (-: Erik also asked about a script to send notifications to project mailing lists when a change get committed to the arch archive. This is a little harder to implement, but should be doable via the "dnotify" agent. I'll look into that when I have the time. Anyway, thanks for putting up common-lisp.net! Good night, -- Andreas Fuchs, <asf(a)acm.org>, asf(a)jabber.at, antifuchs

5 6

[Clo-devel] learning
by Mario Mommer 21 Aug '03

21 Aug '03

Hi, I've updated the "resources & learning" page. It is here: http://www.igpm.rwth-aachen.de/mommer/white_sands/learn.html What do you guys think? Should I call this page "learning Common Lisp" instead and reshuffle everything? I'm planning to integrate this with the rest of the site soon, if nobody objects... Regards, Mario.

3 4

[Clo-devel] Re: Common-lisp.net
by Nikodemus Siivola 20 Aug '03

20 Aug '03

On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 03:40:33PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote: > are the mailing lists available on gmane.org? Clo-devel should now be available on gmane, archives coming up. Cheers, -- Nikodemus

1 0

[Clo-devel] Common-lisp.net
by Nikodemus Siivola 20 Aug '03

20 Aug '03

[ Apologies to those who get this twice. ] As seen on cll: "It is a pleasure to announce http://common-lisp.net, a web-site dedicated to providing the Common Lisp community with development resources, including CVS, FTP, mailing lists, and web-space. Future plans include Subversion and Arch support, co-operation with other related projects, plus news and articles (authors are welcome!)." CCLAN is definitely a project we (Common-lisp.net) would like to co-operate with. Possibilities include: * CCLAN node at ftp://ftp.common-lisp.net/pub/cclan/ * Semi-automatic inclusion of projects hosted at Common-lisp.net to CCLAN: hosted projects fullfilling CCLAN requirements would be provided a mechanism for making releases into CCLAN without human intervention (or whatever amount of human intervention is considered necessary for safety). The first is probably a relatively simple matter, but the second would require among other things a common aproach to project names. Before boring everyone with my own thoughts on this I'd like to hear if CCLAN folks consider either option in the least viable. [ Note: Let's keep this discussion on cclan-list, and drop clo-devel from CC. People on clo-devel interested in this should subscribe to cclan-list for the duration. ] Cheers, -- Nikodemus

1 0

[Clo-devel] Re: Common-lisp.net
by Nikodemus Siivola 19 Aug '03

19 Aug '03

On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 03:40:33PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote: > are the mailing lists available on gmane.org? Not yet. ,)= Cheers, -- Nikodemus

1 0

[Clo-devel] Common-lisp.net
by Nikodemus Siivola 19 Aug '03

19 Aug '03

As seen on cll: "It is a pleasure to announce http://common-lisp.net, a web-site dedicated to providing the Common Lisp community with development resources, including CVS, FTP, mailing lists, and web-space. Future plans include Subversion and Arch support, co-operation with other related projects, plus news and articles (authors are welcome!)." CCLAN is definitely a project we (Common-lisp.net) would like to co-operate with. Possibilities include: * CCLAN node at ftp://ftp.common-lisp.net/pub/cclan/ * Semi-automatic inclusion of projects hosted at Common-lisp.net to CCLAN: hosted projects fullfilling CCLAN requirements would be provided a mechanism for making releases into CCLAN without human intervention (or whatever amount of human intervention is considered necessary for safety). The first is probably a relatively simple matter, but the second would require among other things a common aproach to project names. Before boring everyone with my own thoughts on this I'd like to hear if CCLAN folks consider either option in the least viable. [ Note: Let's keep this discussion on cclan-list, and drop clo-devel from CC. People on clo-devel interested in this should subscribe to cclan-list for the duration. ] Cheers, -- Nikodemus

1 0

[Clo-devel] predicting the need for more tables on the webpage
by Erik Enge 18 Aug '03

18 Aug '03

I think we need two more tables (boxes is probably a better word) in the very near future: one for news items ("just set up anoncvs; server upgrade at 12:00", etc.) and one for articles ("how to use albert with your .asd file; unit test framework study", etc.). What do you think about it? Would they fit with our current layout? I think these need to be on the front page, but not necessarily on any other page. Erik.

4 8

[Clo-devel] viewcvs
by Erik Enge 18 Aug '03

18 Aug '03

What do you guys think of this?: http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ Projects can link to it by doing: http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/?cvsroot=rfc2822 Thought? Personally I think this is probably yet another thing we could offer to developers. Erik.

2 1

[Clo-devel] anonymous cvs
by Marco Baringer 15 Aug '03

15 Aug '03

maybe i just missed it, but is anonymous cvs read access enabled? -- -Marco Ring the bells that still can ring. Forget your perfect offering. There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in. -Leonard Cohen

3 3

[Clo-devel] Re: [Admin] Hosting request
by nikodemus＠random-state.net 13 Aug '03

13 Aug '03

On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 07:55:09PM +0300, nikodemus(a)random-state.net wrote: > [ Before you all wonder if I've lost my mind: no. This will serve as a > test-case for auditing projects for hosting. This also means that > politeness is *not* expected. To avoid conflict of interest ,)= I > will not take part in this conversation unless clarification, etc is > asked. ] And as "user-input" I must say that a form of somesort would be nice to have. Just plain text that can be copied to an email is fine. I've attached a proposal for such a form. Cheers, -- Nikodemus

4 3