- slime-devel - mailman3.common-lisp.net

[slime-devel] Who specializes in WHO-SPECIALIZES?
by Dan Farina 03 Aug '07

03 Aug '07

Silly question: I've noticed now that when starting up SLIME + SBCL that there is some functionality that is seemingly not provided: > WARNING: These Swank interfaces are unimplemented: > (CALLS-WHO DISASSEMBLE-FRAME SLDB-BREAK-AT-START SLDB-BREAK-ON-RETURN > WHO-SPECIALIZES) My question is what Lisp implementations do support various options and features of SWANK. It might be nice to have a compatibility matrix or something on the front page, as I think knowing who-supports-what in SWANK could be of great importance to some. In particular, the most important one that is paining me a tiny bit by its absence is CALLS-WHO. Thanks, df

1 0

[slime-devel] How would you like unlimited hits to your website 15 minutes from now ?
by Hit-Booster＠common-lisp.net 02 Aug '07

02 Aug '07

1 0

[slime-devel] slime-eval-last-expression scrolls buffer
by Austin Haas 29 Jul '07

29 Jul '07

When I run (c-x c-e), the whole buffer scrolls down so that point is positioned at the last line on the screen. Is this the expected behavior? Is there any way to prevent it? -austin -- Austin Haas Pet Tomato, Inc. http://pettomato.com

2 2

[slime-devel] Post your ads where people read them!!!
by Feed＠common-lisp.net 29 Jul '07

29 Jul '07

1 0

[slime-devel] Folding mode support
by Alain Picard 24 Jul '07

24 Jul '07

Dear slimers, I like to use folding-mode to structure my lisp files. However it drives me insane that this breaks slime's SLIME-EDIT-DEFINITION functionality if the buffer is already loaded and folded somehow. This little piece of advice fixes this. I think it may more properly belong in folding-mode than in slime, but in the short term, slimer's are the ones who will most benefit, so I thought I'd share it with you guys. (defadvice slime-goto-location-position (around slime-folding-goto-line first activate) "Jump to a slime position in a buffer in folding-mode." (if folding-mode (let ((line nil)) (folding-open-buffer) ad-do-it (setq line (line-number-at-pos)) (folding-goto-line line)) ad-do-it)) Cheers, --ap -- Please read about why Top Posting is evil at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting and http://www.dickalba.demon.co.uk/usenet/guide/faq_topp.html Please read about why HTML in email is evil at: http://www.birdhouse.org/etc/evilmail.html

1 0

[slime-devel] rewriting commands
by Tamas K Papp 24 Jul '07

24 Jul '07

I am trying to find out how to do this right. Suppose I write a command on the repl and press enter: CL-USER> (1+ 2) 3 then I go back and edit that line, trying to reuse part of what I wrote (in this case, I type "(describe " before and ")" after the previous expression, then press ENTER, ENTER: CL-USER> (describe (1+ 2)) 3 CL-USER> (1+ 2)) and I end up with an incomplete expression (as above) and an error. How can I reuse edited lines from the REPL? Copy & paste with C-K C-Y works, but there must be a better way. Tamas

3 2

[slime-devel] slime-reindent-defun
by Gábor Melis 24 Jul '07

24 Jul '07

Now that it's fixed in the repl it breaks in lisp buffer with 'wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, nil' Index: slime.el =================================================================== RCS file: /project/slime/cvsroot/slime/slime.el,v retrieving revision 1.794 diff -u -p -r1.794 slime.el --- slime.el 28 Jun 2007 12:27:51 -0000 1.794 +++ slime.el 6 Jul 2007 16:21:16 -0000 @@ -10047,7 +10047,9 @@ be treated as a paragraph. This is usef (fill-paragraph nil) (let ((start (progn (unless (or (and (zerop (current-column)) (eq ?\( (char-after))) - (slime-repl-at-prompt-start-p)) + (and (boundp 'slime-repl-input-start-mark) + slime-repl-input-start-mark + (slime-repl-at-prompt-start-p))) (slime-beginning-of-defun)) (point))) (end (ignore-errors (slime-end-of-defun) (point))))

1 1

[slime-devel] bug: ( at the beginning of the line in docstring
by Tamas K Papp 21 Jul '07

21 Jul '07

I asked about this issue in comp.lang.lisp and was told it might be a bug. See http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/browse_thread/thread/dd17e76e… Tamas

2 1

[slime-devel] own thread versus repl thread
by Joe Corneli 18 Jul '07

18 Jul '07

On my remote slime, (slime-eval (list 'swank:eval-and-grab-output (format "%s" '*package*))) returns: ("" "#<PACKAGE \"COMMON-LISP-USER\">") and on my local slime, it returns: ("" "#<PACKAGE \"ELEPHANT-USER\">") But in both cases, I am in the :elephant-user package on the REPL. What's the story? I thought that the combo of functions used here was always going to evaluate its arguments on the same thread that is used in the REPL?

1 0

[slime-devel] [PATCH] Inspector bug when *slime-inspect-contents-limit* is non-NIL
by Madhu 17 Jul '07

17 Jul '07

The inspector currently throws an out out of bound error when inspecting arrays of length less than *slime-inspect-contents-limit*. To see the bug: set *slime-inspect-contents-limit* to 10 and C-c I "foobar" The attached patch is in addition to the patch posted in <m3fy4ss6ge.fsf(a)robolove.meer.net> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.slime.devel/6333 --- swank.lisp.~1.490.~ 2007-06-04 21:47:17.000000000 +0530 +++ swank.lisp 2007-07-13 21:30:09.000000000 +0530 @@ -4603,9 +4608,12 @@ '("Contents:" (:newline)) (if (and *slime-inspect-contents-limit* (>= (array-total-size array) *slime-inspect-contents-limit*)) - (inspect-bigger-piece-actions array (length array)) + (inspect-bigger-piece-actions array (length array)) nil) - (loop for i below (or *slime-inspect-contents-limit* (array-total-size array)) + (loop with array-size = (array-total-size array) + for i below (if *slime-inspect-contents-limit* + (min *slime-inspect-contents-limit* array-size) + array-size) append (label-value-line i (row-major-aref array i)))))) (defmethod inspect-for-emacs ((char character) inspector)

1 0