clo-devel

clo-devel@common-lisp.net

3 participants
610 discussions

Mailing list removal (on owner request)
by Erik Huelsmann 02 Apr '18

02 Apr '18

Hi, On request of the mailing list owner, the following lists (but not their archives) have been removed: cl-interpol-devel rdnzl-announce rdnzl-devel regex-coach fm-lisp Regards, -- Bye, Erik. http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.

1 0

2018 Site Redesign Proposal
by Cheryl Yang 01 Apr '18

01 Apr '18

Hello everyone, long time no talk! I hope everyone has been well. I've had... a hectic time of it but I'm settling down finally. I should apologize for how MIA and hard-to-reach I have been. Hopefully now that things are more stable in my personal life, I can give more time to CL and other projects. As a start, I've written a basic design update for Common-Lisp.net. You can view and comment on the code for it here: https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/clo/site/merge_requests/1 This features actual mobile responsiveness (yes, the last design had an embarrassing mistake, I know!) and removes the mtime dependency that was preventing us from upgrading Ruby on CLnet's servers. I think we're still on a very old Ruby version, hopefully this will allow us to upgrade it, or at least remove one more barrier. Please take your time to review it at your leisure; I know I'm sort of surprising everyone with this. I've attached a few screenshots so you can see what it looks like at a glance. Thank you, - C. Yang

3 3

Re: Context specific translations?
by Erik Huelsmann 05 Mar '18

05 Mar '18

Hi, Sorry, yes, wrong list! Thanks for the pointers! Ik use them while mailing the right list. Regards, Erik On Mar 5, 2018 22:22, "Daniel Herring" <dherring(a)tentpost.com> wrote: Hi Erik, Did this get sent to the wrong list? Anyway, I would recommend mimicking Qt's approach to translation. If possible, re-use their file formats. Then you can use their toolchain for maintaining translations. http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/linguist-overview.html - Daniel On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Erik Huelsmann wrote: Hi, > > In our translation catelog, we have the word "To". There are multiple uses > for this word, which is marked for translation for all uses. > > One use is the case of a date range ("From ... To ...."). Another use is > the case of an address ("To: <address on the next line(s)>". > > When translating these to Dutch, these use cases have very different > translations (Date range: "Tot"; address: "Aan"). > > It seems we need some context specific translations. However, our > translation library (which isn't gettext), doesn't cater for them. > > Any ideas as to how to approach this problem? > > How will we know which domains we need to distinguish? > > > > -- > Bye, > Erik. > > http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. > Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in. > >

1 0

Context specific translations?
by Erik Huelsmann 05 Mar '18

05 Mar '18

Hi, In our translation catelog, we have the word "To". There are multiple uses for this word, which is marked for translation for all uses. One use is the case of a date range ("From ... To ...."). Another use is the case of an address ("To: <address on the next line(s)>". When translating these to Dutch, these use cases have very different translations (Date range: "Tot"; address: "Aan"). It seems we need some context specific translations. However, our translation library (which isn't gettext), doesn't cater for them. Any ideas as to how to approach this problem? How will we know which domains we need to distinguish? -- Bye, Erik. http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.

2 1

Remaining Darcs repositories on common-lisp.net
by Erik Huelsmann 18 Feb '18

18 Feb '18

Hi, There are 107 darcs repositories remaining on common-lisp.net which have not been converted to Git yet. I'm looking at what to do with those. These 107 seem to fall into the following categories: 1. darcs-managed web pages (i.e.: /srv/project/*/public_html/_darcs) 2. project-published repositories (i.e.: /srv/project/*/public_html/<repository-name>/_darcs) which were not registered with darcsweb. The first category I'm thinking of converting to Git, importing in Gitlab as a 'public_html' project in the associated project group. Then, convert the project's public_html folder from Darcs repository to Git repository by replacing the _darcs directory with a .git directory. The second category I'm thinking of converting to git using the same procedure as the ones that just moved to GitLab (the published Darcsweb list). Comments? -- Bye, Erik. http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.

2 1

darcs + darcsweb migration: Saturday February 17 2018
by Erik Huelsmann 18 Feb '18

18 Feb '18

Hi, As announced before, the darcs repositories listed at https://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi will be migrated to Git+GitLab. At the same time, darcs "support" will be deprecated on Common-Lisp.net and the darcsweb URL above will be replaced by a rewrite rule redirecting to GitLab. Preparations have progressed well enough to be able to announce migration to take place coming Saturday (Feb 17). common-lisp.net operations will be available during migration. Kind regards, -- Bye, Erik. http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.

1 1

https://gitlab.common-lisp.net returns http status 502
by R. Matthew Emerson 11 Feb '18

11 Feb '18

Hi. https://gitlab.common-lisp.net is currently returning http 502.

3 4

Additional darcs repositories to be migrated? (working to convert the darcs repositories)
by Erik Huelsmann 31 Jan '18

31 Jan '18

Hi all, The current list of repositories to migrate from darcs to GitLab, is the list shown on https://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi . Are there any other repositories that need to be migrated to GitLab that this community is aware of? Thanks! Regards, Erik. On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:21 AM, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > While running the first conversion tests, I ran into the following > repositories (browsable through https://common-lisp.net/cgi- > bin/darcsweb.cgi) already have GitLab repositories in place > (<project>/<repository>): > > * adw-charting/adw-charting > * alexandria/alexandria > * bordeaux-threads/bordeau-threads > * cl-store/cl-store > * editor-hints/named-readtables > * elephant/elephant > * gestalt/gestalt > * mel-base/mel-base > * parenscript/parenscript > > > Given the age of all of these repositories, I'm planning to archive these > duplicated repositories and not migrate them to GitLab (as that would mean > the repositories would be either duplicating other repositories or prior > repositories would be overwritten). > > > Any comments regarding this plan? Maybe someone knows that some of these > repositories need to be migrated to GitLab - replacing what's currently > there? > > > Regards, > > > Erik. > > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> After converting common-lisp.net to LetsEncrypt/certbot, I've taken a >> bit of time to research the long-overdue move from darcs to Git. >> >> Fortunately, taking time away from a task allows for creativity to kick >> in: I've found an (acceptable to me) way to bulk convert all repositories >> listed in https://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi >> >> I'm likely to implement a minimal redirect from the existing darcsweb >> URLs to the resulting GitLab git projects. However, since the commit SHAs >> don't match, anything more complex requires pretty extensive mapping >> tables. Please consider this as an invitation to do that work! :-) >> >> >> Final announcement of a cut-over will be done 1 week in advance of the >> cut-over itself. Cut-over will roughly take 4 hours when the window is >> there (although I can't imagine anybody actually *using* these repositories >> other than as read-only sources). >> >> -- >> Bye, >> >> Erik. >> >> http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. >> Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in. >> > > > > -- > Bye, > > Erik. > > http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. > Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in. > -- Bye, Erik. http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.

1 0

Darcs & darcsweb deprecation; working to convert the darcs repositories
by Erik Huelsmann 31 Jan '18

31 Jan '18

Hi all, After I complete the migration of all repositories listed in darcsweb (excluding the ones below), I'll be installing a rewrite rule on the darcsweb, redirecting to GitLab. At that time, I'm planning to remove both Darcs and Darcsweb support from common-lisp.net, unless there are objections from the community, of course. Regards, Erik. On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:21 AM, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > While running the first conversion tests, I ran into the following > repositories (browsable through https://common-lisp.net/cgi- > bin/darcsweb.cgi) already have GitLab repositories in place > (<project>/<repository>): > > * adw-charting/adw-charting > * alexandria/alexandria > * bordeaux-threads/bordeau-threads > * cl-store/cl-store > * editor-hints/named-readtables > * elephant/elephant > * gestalt/gestalt > * mel-base/mel-base > * parenscript/parenscript > > > Given the age of all of these repositories, I'm planning to archive these > duplicated repositories and not migrate them to GitLab (as that would mean > the repositories would be either duplicating other repositories or prior > repositories would be overwritten). > > > Any comments regarding this plan? Maybe someone knows that some of these > repositories need to be migrated to GitLab - replacing what's currently > there? > > > Regards, > > > Erik. > > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> After converting common-lisp.net to LetsEncrypt/certbot, I've taken a >> bit of time to research the long-overdue move from darcs to Git. >> >> Fortunately, taking time away from a task allows for creativity to kick >> in: I've found an (acceptable to me) way to bulk convert all repositories >> listed in https://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi >> >> I'm likely to implement a minimal redirect from the existing darcsweb >> URLs to the resulting GitLab git projects. However, since the commit SHAs >> don't match, anything more complex requires pretty extensive mapping >> tables. Please consider this as an invitation to do that work! :-) >> >> >> Final announcement of a cut-over will be done 1 week in advance of the >> cut-over itself. Cut-over will roughly take 4 hours when the window is >> there (although I can't imagine anybody actually *using* these repositories >> other than as read-only sources). >> >> -- >> Bye, >> >> Erik. >> >> http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. >> Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in. >> > > > > -- > Bye, > > Erik. > > http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. > Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in. > -- Bye, Erik. http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.

1 0

Duplicate repositories: working to convert the darcs repositories
by Erik Huelsmann 31 Jan '18

31 Jan '18

Hi, While running the first conversion tests, I ran into the following repositories (browsable through https://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi) already have GitLab repositories in place (<project>/<repository>): * adw-charting/adw-charting * alexandria/alexandria * bordeaux-threads/bordeau-threads * cl-store/cl-store * editor-hints/named-readtables * elephant/elephant * gestalt/gestalt * mel-base/mel-base * parenscript/parenscript Given the age of all of these repositories, I'm planning to archive these duplicated repositories and not migrate them to GitLab (as that would mean the repositories would be either duplicating other repositories or prior repositories would be overwritten). Any comments regarding this plan? Maybe someone knows that some of these repositories need to be migrated to GitLab - replacing what's currently there? Regards, Erik. On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > After converting common-lisp.net to LetsEncrypt/certbot, I've taken a bit > of time to research the long-overdue move from darcs to Git. > > Fortunately, taking time away from a task allows for creativity to kick > in: I've found an (acceptable to me) way to bulk convert all repositories > listed in https://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi > > I'm likely to implement a minimal redirect from the existing darcsweb URLs > to the resulting GitLab git projects. However, since the commit SHAs don't > match, anything more complex requires pretty extensive mapping tables. > Please consider this as an invitation to do that work! :-) > > > Final announcement of a cut-over will be done 1 week in advance of the > cut-over itself. Cut-over will roughly take 4 hours when the window is > there (although I can't imagine anybody actually *using* these repositories > other than as read-only sources). > > -- > Bye, > > Erik. > > http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. > Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in. > -- Bye, Erik. http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
...
61
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

clo-devel